Food policy supports agriculture and household food security by encouraging farmers to increase output. Despite implementing the Planting for Food and Jobs program in Ghana, the country still imports staple crops, suggesting mixed effectiveness. This study analyzed challenges, beneficiary perceptions, and policy impacts on agricultural productivity using secondary data from Sekyere Kumawu District, Ashanti Region, Ghana. Ghanaian beneficiaries were older and educated, had smaller households, and had less experience on larger plots. The Ghanaian farmers received improved seeds, fertilizers, and subsidized seeds. The farmers viewed the food program positively regarding food security. Key challenges PFJ faced were funding, resource allocation, implementation, environmental factors, post-harvest losses, market access, and economic challenges. Both programs positively impacted crop productivity. Agricultural policy recommendations include providing suitable machinery, ensuring access to high-quality seeds, adjusting production targets, prioritizing comprehensive training, improving stakeholder collaboration, and switching from indirect to direct subsidies can enhance food policy efficiency in Ghana.
| Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12 |
| Page(s) | 169-176 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Food Policy, Government, Input Subsidy, PFJ, Agricultural Productivity
| [1] | United Nations (2024). Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Report of the Secretary-General, 1–26. |
| [2] |
United Nations (2023). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. Towards a Rescue Plan for People and Planet, 1-77.
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf |
| [3] | Fudjaja, L., Tenriawaru, A. N., Mahyuddin, Saadah, Darwis, Diansari, P., Sulili, A. & Wirdansyah, A. (2020). Analysis of the Relationship of Soybean Farmers Response and Income on the Pajale Special Efforts (UPSUS). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1), 012046. |
| [4] | Purnamasari, M., Huang, W. C. & Priyanto, B. (2023). The Impact of Government Food Policy on Farm Efficiency of Beneficiary Small-Scale Farmers in Indonesia. Agriculture, 13(6), 1257. |
| [5] | Shafiani, F. (2018). Implementasi Program Upsus Pajale (Upaya Khusus Padi Jagung Kedelai) Dalam Upaya Swasembada Pangan (Studi Pada Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Sumbawa). Master of Science Thesis, Universitas Brawijaya. |
| [6] | Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2017). Planting for Food and Jobs: Strategic Plan for Implementation (2017-2022). 1–2. |
| [7] | European Union (2021). A Review of the Ghana Planting for Food and Jobs Program: 2017-2022. 1–2. |
| [8] | Donkoh, J. J. A. (2024) The Role of Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs Policy in Local Economic Development. Journal Of Production, Operations Management and Economics, 4(4), 13–20. |
| [9] | Pauw, K. (2022). A Review of Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs Program: Implementation, Impacts, Benefits, And Costs. Food Security, 14: 1321–1335. |
| [10] | Ismaila, S. & Tanko, M. (2021). Exploring Relative Deprivation Theory in the Rice Industry: Planting for Food and Jobs (PFJ) in Northern Ghana. Technology in Society, 65, 101556. |
| [11] | Ansah, I. G. K., Lambongang, M. & Donkoh, S. A. (2020). Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs Programme: A Look at the Role of Capability in Farmers’ Participation. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21(2), 161–182. |
| [12] | Tanko, M, Ismaila, S. & Sadiq, S. A. (2019). Planting for Food and Jobs (PFJ): A Panacea for Productivity and Welfare of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana. Cogent Economics and Finance, 7(1), 1693121. |
| [13] | Awafo, E. A., Amrago, E. C., Amankwah, E. & Akolgo, G. A. (2024). Planting for Food and Jobs Participation and its Impact on Maize Productivity in Ghana: Implications for Research and Policy. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2328883. |
| [14] | Prah, S., Asante, B. O., Aidoo, R., Mensah, J. O. & Nimoh, F. (2023) Impact of Agricultural Policy Intervention on Yield and Profitability of Maize Farmers: The Case of Planting for Food and Jobs (PFJ) Programme in Ghana. Cogent Food Agriculture, 9, 2249928. |
| [15] | Hemming, D. J., Chirwa, E. W., Dorward. A., Ruffhead, H. J., Hill, R., Osborn, J., Langer, L., Harman, L., Asaoka, H., Coffey, C. & Philips, D. (2018) Agricultural Input Subsidies for Improving Productivity, Farm Income, Consumer Welfare and Wider Growth in Low– and Lower–Middle–Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–153. |
| [16] | Walls, H. L., Johnston, D., Tak. M., Dixon, J., Hanefeld, J., Hull, E. & Smith, R. D. (2018). The Impact of Agricultural Input Subsidies on Food and Nutrition Security: A Systematic Review. Food Security, 10(3), 1425–1436. |
| [17] | Putri, M. A., Taifur, W. D. & Bachtiar, N. (2023). Implementation of Fertilizer Subsidies: Impact on Agriculture and Food Security in Indonesia (A Critical Review). Journal of Management Accounting General Finance and International Economic Issues, 3(1), 272–286. |
| [18] | Wirakusuma, G. (2020). Is Input Subsidy Still Useful for Indonesian Agriculture? An Empirical Review of Rice Productivity at The Household Level. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 28(1), 17–28. |
| [19] | World Bank (2024). Databank -Ghana: World Development Indicators. 1–2. |
| [20] | FAOSTAT (2023) World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. |
| [21] | MoFA (2021). Facts & Figures: Agriculture in Ghana. Accra, Ghana. |
| [22] | Ghana Statistical Service (2021). Population and Housing Census: Summary Report Final Results, Ghana. 1–2 |
| [23] | Nyamekye, A. P., Tian, Z. & Cheng, F. (2021). Analysis on the Contribution of Agricultural Sector on The Economic Development of Ghana. Open Journal of Business and Management 09, 1297–1311. |
| [24] | Alestig, M. (2023). Price Interventions as a Part of Living Income Strategies: Lessons Learned from Piloting a Price Premium Mechanism for Basmati Rice Farmers in Pakistan, 1-48. |
| [25] | Lv N, Liu F, Zhu H, Wang G (2022) Effect of Government Intervention and Market Incentives on Farmer Organic Fertilizer Application Behavior and Agricultural Emission Reduction. Natural Hazards Review, 24(1). |
| [26] | Forrest, J. Y. L., Liu, J., Guo, H., Liu, Y., Phipps, T. M., Yang, Y. & Cao, Y. (2022). Market Competition and Economic Effects of Government Policies. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 13(1), 1–23. |
| [27] | Wu, L., Hu, K., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T. & Hamid, I. (2022). The Impact of Government Subsidies on Technological Innovation in Agribusiness: The Case for China. Sustainability, 14(21), 14003. |
| [28] | Fan, T., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Shanthikumar, J. G. & Wu, Y. (2023). Output-Oriented Agricultural Subsidy Design. Management Science, 70(3), 14481– 464. |
| [29] | Nguyen, L., Russ, J. & Triyana, M. (2023) The Effect of Agricultural Input Subsidies on Productivity: A Meta-Analysis. Policy Research Working Paper 10399, 1–21. |
| [30] | Awaliatul, I. N. & Kuntadi, E. B. (2020). Farmer’s Response to Upsus Pajale’s Programs in order to Increase Corn Production in Jember District. Tanjungpura International Journal on Dynamics Economic, Social Sciences and Agribusiness, 1(1)1–19. |
| [31] | Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia (2015). Pedoman Upaya Khusus (UPSUS) Peringkatan Produski Padi, Jagung Dan Kedelai Melalui Program Perbaikan Jaringan Irrigasi Dan Sarana Pendukungnya Tahun Anggaran, 1–28. |
| [32] |
Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2019). Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) For 2020-2023.
https://www.mofep.gov.gh/sites/default/files/pbb-estimates/2020/2020-PBB-MoFA.pdf |
| [33] | Prasetyo, R. O. & Kadir, K. (2024). Does Government Assistance Increase the Yield of Food Crops in Indonesia? Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 13(1), 25–41. |
| [34] |
Modern Ghana (2022). Planting for Food and Jobs Fails Due to Poor Implementation: General Agriculture Workers Union, 1–2.
https://www.modernghana.com/news/1177992/planting-for-food-and-jobs-failed-due-to-poor-impl.html |
| [35] | Antoni, A. & Amruzi, M. (2022). Impact of Upsus Pajale Policy at Farmers’ Level and Its Implications on Food Security and Welfare of Rice Farmers in Lebak Rice Land Iin Ogan Komering Ilir District of Indonesia. Rjoas. 5(125): 37–48. |
| [36] | Mahyuddin, Saadah, Darwis, Anuhu N, Diansari P, Anisa A, Sulili A, Wirdansyah A (2020) Analysis of Soybean Farmers Response on Pajale Special Efforts Implementation (UPSUS) Program. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1), 012026. |
| [37] | Nugroho, A. D., Ummu, C., Puji, R. A., Vinte, L. I., Lestari, C., Tri, S. P., Anjarwati. A., Wisnu, E. B. & Prata, D. A. (2018). Implementation of Special Efforts Program of Sustainable Food Self-Sufficiency in Kendal Regency Central Java Province. Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberbdayaan Masyarakat, 2(2): 287–296. |
| [38] | Tetteh, J. L. (2024). Why Food Insecurity Persists Despite the Planting for Food and Jobs Policy in Ghana. 1–2. |
APA Style
Agbolosoo, J. A., Hutagaol, M. P. (2024). A Review of the Government Food Policy on Agricultural Productivity in Ghana. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 8(4), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12
ACS Style
Agbolosoo, J. A.; Hutagaol, M. P. A Review of the Government Food Policy on Agricultural Productivity in Ghana. J. Public Policy Adm. 2024, 8(4), 169-176. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12,
author = {John Atsu Agbolosoo and Manuntun Parulain Hutagaol},
title = {A Review of the Government Food Policy on Agricultural Productivity in Ghana
},
journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {169-176},
doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20240804.12},
abstract = {Food policy supports agriculture and household food security by encouraging farmers to increase output. Despite implementing the Planting for Food and Jobs program in Ghana, the country still imports staple crops, suggesting mixed effectiveness. This study analyzed challenges, beneficiary perceptions, and policy impacts on agricultural productivity using secondary data from Sekyere Kumawu District, Ashanti Region, Ghana. Ghanaian beneficiaries were older and educated, had smaller households, and had less experience on larger plots. The Ghanaian farmers received improved seeds, fertilizers, and subsidized seeds. The farmers viewed the food program positively regarding food security. Key challenges PFJ faced were funding, resource allocation, implementation, environmental factors, post-harvest losses, market access, and economic challenges. Both programs positively impacted crop productivity. Agricultural policy recommendations include providing suitable machinery, ensuring access to high-quality seeds, adjusting production targets, prioritizing comprehensive training, improving stakeholder collaboration, and switching from indirect to direct subsidies can enhance food policy efficiency in Ghana.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Review of the Government Food Policy on Agricultural Productivity in Ghana AU - John Atsu Agbolosoo AU - Manuntun Parulain Hutagaol Y1 - 2024/12/13 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 169 EP - 176 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20240804.12 AB - Food policy supports agriculture and household food security by encouraging farmers to increase output. Despite implementing the Planting for Food and Jobs program in Ghana, the country still imports staple crops, suggesting mixed effectiveness. This study analyzed challenges, beneficiary perceptions, and policy impacts on agricultural productivity using secondary data from Sekyere Kumawu District, Ashanti Region, Ghana. Ghanaian beneficiaries were older and educated, had smaller households, and had less experience on larger plots. The Ghanaian farmers received improved seeds, fertilizers, and subsidized seeds. The farmers viewed the food program positively regarding food security. Key challenges PFJ faced were funding, resource allocation, implementation, environmental factors, post-harvest losses, market access, and economic challenges. Both programs positively impacted crop productivity. Agricultural policy recommendations include providing suitable machinery, ensuring access to high-quality seeds, adjusting production targets, prioritizing comprehensive training, improving stakeholder collaboration, and switching from indirect to direct subsidies can enhance food policy efficiency in Ghana. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics & Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor University(IPB), Bogor City, Indonesia
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics & Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor University(IPB), Bogor City, Indonesia
