| Peer-Reviewed

Investigating Barriers to Effective Reporting of Sustainable Development Goals by Government Institutions in Kenya

Received: 12 February 2023    Accepted: 15 March 2023    Published: 6 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the barriers to effective reporting of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Kenya, with the primary focus being environmental reporting using the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) as a reference point. The objectives were to determine challenges when reporting environmental statistics, and propose recommendations to enhance effective reporting of environmental statistics by NEMA. The study was anchored on accountability and sustainability theories. Descriptive design was adopted, and the study population was drawn from NEMA, State Department of Planning in Kenya, and the United Nations Environment Programme. The study sampled 98 respondents using purposive sampling strategy where 91 filled and returned self-administered questionnaires that were subjected to analysis. The generated data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25. The results showed that there was a positive significant moderate linear relationship between effective reporting of SDGs and NEMA’s institutional capacity, M&E Framework, and enabling environment. However, environmental governance was not a significant predictor. The study concluded that organizations need enhanced technology for data acquisition, clear M&E structures, and continuous institutional capacity building to address changing reporting environment and policy needs. The study recommends bridging of existing knowledge gaps in the sector through research and partnership, organizational and individual capacity building, establishment of innovation/science centers, data driven governance, policy coherence, and environmental advocacy.

Published in Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13
Page(s) 49-55
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Effective Reporting, Institutional Capacity, Monitoring and Evaluation, Environmental Governance, Enabling Environment, SDGs, NEMA

References
[1] Alaerts, G., & Kaspersm, J. (2009). Progress and challenges in knowledge and capacity development. In M. Blockland, G. Alaerts, & J. Kaspersma, Capacity development for improved water management (p. 16). London, UK: Taylor and Francis Group.
[2] Arunachalam, M. (2011). International declarations on sustainable development: Implications for community and accountability. Journal of the Asia-Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability, 17 (2), 75-107.
[3] Baguma, S. D. (2014). Rethinking knowledge management as a stimulant to improved use of M&E processes and results. Centre for development innovation. Retrieved from http://www.managingforimpact.org/sites/default/files/case/cdi_me_seminar_2014_perspective_1_knowledge_management_sylvester_baguma.pdf
[4] Caron, M. A., Lapointe, A., & Gendron, C. (2012). Social accounting and public management. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 227-251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700902893114.
[5] Centre for learning on evaluation and results. (2012). African monitoring and evaluation systems. Johannesburg, SA: Graduate school of public and development management. University of the Witwatersrand.
[6] Collins, J. (2015, August 17). 3 ways to help you measure your project performance. Retrieved January 27, 2018, from www.ims-web.com/blog/3-ways-to-help-you-measure-your-project-performance
[7] Ekardt, F. (2009). Theory of sustainability. Retrieved from research unit sustainability and climate policy: http://www.sustainability-justice-climate.eu/en/nachhaltigkeit.html
[8] Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International journal of sustainable development, 8 (1/2), 12-30.
[9] Jenkins, W. (n.d). Sustainability theory. Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability: The spirit of sustainability, 23 (1), 381-384.
[10] Kenya, Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources. (2013). National environment policy. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.
[11] Kenya, State Department for planning. (2020). About us. Retrieved from planning.go.ke: https://planning.go.ke/
[12] Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accounatbility. Psychological bulletin, 125 (2), 255-275.
[13] Mireri, C., & Letema, S. (2012). Review of environmental governance in Kenya: Analysis of environmental policy and institutional frameworks. Research Gate. 153-166. Retrieved from researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291108370_Review_of_environmental_governance_in_Kenya_Analysis_of_environmental_policy_and_institutional_frameworks
[14] Mugo, P. M., & Oleche, M. O. (2015, December). Monitoring and evaluation of development projects and economic growth in Kenya. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 2 (6), 52-63.
[15] National Environment Management Authority. (2020). About us. Retrieved from Departmentsnema.go.ke: http://www.nema.go.ke/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6&Itemid=140
[16] Ortigara, A. R., Kay, M., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2018). A Review of the SDG 6 synthesis report 2018 from an education, training and research perspective. ResearchGate, 10, 1-22. doi: 10.3390/w10101353.
[17] Project Management Institute. (2018). What is project management. Retrieved January 29, 2018, from www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/what-is-project-management
[18] United Nations. (2015). The millennium development goals report. Newyork, NY: United Nations.
[19] United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluation for development results. Newyork, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
[20] United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Global environment outlook-GEO 6. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations.
[21] United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Measuring Progress: Towards achieving the environmental dimension of the SDGs. Nairobi, Kenya: UNON Publishing Services Section.
[22] United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Ministreal Declaration of the United Nations Environmental Assembly at its Fourth Session. Retrieved from http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27925/K1901029%20-%20UNEP-EA.4-HLS.1%20-%20Advance.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
[23] Willems, S., & Baumert, K. (2003). Institutional capacity and climate actions. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development International Energy Agency.
[24] World Bank Group. (2016). Kenya-country economic memorandum. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
[25] Zhang, J., Xu, Y., Li, Y., He, F., & Chen, S. (2005). Natural environment types and environment characteristics in Northwest China. ResearchGate, 6 (1), 93-99.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kibe Peter Mwangi, Mary Mogute, Philemon Yugi. (2023). Investigating Barriers to Effective Reporting of Sustainable Development Goals by Government Institutions in Kenya. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 7(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kibe Peter Mwangi; Mary Mogute; Philemon Yugi. Investigating Barriers to Effective Reporting of Sustainable Development Goals by Government Institutions in Kenya. J. Public Policy Adm. 2023, 7(2), 49-55. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kibe Peter Mwangi, Mary Mogute, Philemon Yugi. Investigating Barriers to Effective Reporting of Sustainable Development Goals by Government Institutions in Kenya. J Public Policy Adm. 2023;7(2):49-55. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13,
      author = {Kibe Peter Mwangi and Mary Mogute and Philemon Yugi},
      title = {Investigating Barriers to Effective Reporting of Sustainable Development Goals by Government Institutions in Kenya},
      journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {49-55},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20230702.13},
      abstract = {The purpose of this study was to investigate the barriers to effective reporting of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Kenya, with the primary focus being environmental reporting using the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) as a reference point. The objectives were to determine challenges when reporting environmental statistics, and propose recommendations to enhance effective reporting of environmental statistics by NEMA. The study was anchored on accountability and sustainability theories. Descriptive design was adopted, and the study population was drawn from NEMA, State Department of Planning in Kenya, and the United Nations Environment Programme. The study sampled 98 respondents using purposive sampling strategy where 91 filled and returned self-administered questionnaires that were subjected to analysis. The generated data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25. The results showed that there was a positive significant moderate linear relationship between effective reporting of SDGs and NEMA’s institutional capacity, M&E Framework, and enabling environment. However, environmental governance was not a significant predictor. The study concluded that organizations need enhanced technology for data acquisition, clear M&E structures, and continuous institutional capacity building to address changing reporting environment and policy needs. The study recommends bridging of existing knowledge gaps in the sector through research and partnership, organizational and individual capacity building, establishment of innovation/science centers, data driven governance, policy coherence, and environmental advocacy.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Investigating Barriers to Effective Reporting of Sustainable Development Goals by Government Institutions in Kenya
    AU  - Kibe Peter Mwangi
    AU  - Mary Mogute
    AU  - Philemon Yugi
    Y1  - 2023/06/06
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13
    T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
    JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
    JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
    SP  - 49
    EP  - 55
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-2696
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.13
    AB  - The purpose of this study was to investigate the barriers to effective reporting of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Kenya, with the primary focus being environmental reporting using the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) as a reference point. The objectives were to determine challenges when reporting environmental statistics, and propose recommendations to enhance effective reporting of environmental statistics by NEMA. The study was anchored on accountability and sustainability theories. Descriptive design was adopted, and the study population was drawn from NEMA, State Department of Planning in Kenya, and the United Nations Environment Programme. The study sampled 98 respondents using purposive sampling strategy where 91 filled and returned self-administered questionnaires that were subjected to analysis. The generated data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25. The results showed that there was a positive significant moderate linear relationship between effective reporting of SDGs and NEMA’s institutional capacity, M&E Framework, and enabling environment. However, environmental governance was not a significant predictor. The study concluded that organizations need enhanced technology for data acquisition, clear M&E structures, and continuous institutional capacity building to address changing reporting environment and policy needs. The study recommends bridging of existing knowledge gaps in the sector through research and partnership, organizational and individual capacity building, establishment of innovation/science centers, data driven governance, policy coherence, and environmental advocacy.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Human and Social Sciences, Daystar University, Nairobi, Kenya

  • School of Human and Social Sciences, Daystar University, Nairobi, Kenya

  • School of Human and Social Sciences, Daystar University, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Sections