Regional-Owned Enterprises, abbreviated as BUMD is government instrument that plays an important role in running and developing regional and national economies. BUMD, the capital, comes from separated regional assets to contribute to the region and carry out regional development through services to the community. PT. Pelabuhan Kepri is a subsidiary BUMD of the Kepulauan Riau (Kepri) Province, which has strategic main tasks and functions in managing the potential or water activities in border areas with neighboring countries to improve the business properly. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluation of the management policies of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri as a form of boosting the Kepri economy. The qualitative research method is carried out using a literature study approach that uses existing secondary data, including reports, journals, e-books, websites, and others considered relevant for depth analysis. The results show that it is necessary to strengthen the regional regulation plan (RAPENDA) regarding optimization in management, which must be discussed with stakeholders as a form of policy evaluation in preparing the management of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri in a sustainable manner for the long term. However, it should be emphasized the implementation of RAPENDA is only to improve the quality and quantity of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri in implementing programs that have great potential in the waters of the Kepri Province in the future, so the local own-source revenue can be by the targets to be achieved.
| Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14 |
| Page(s) | 144-150 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Policy Evaluation, BUMD, PT Pelabuhan Kepri, Indonesia
| [1] | Mahadiansar, M., Ikhsan, K., Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S., & Aspariyana, A. (2020). Paradigma pengembangan model pembangunan nasional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 17 (1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v17i1.550. |
| [2] | Ateh, M. Y. (2014). Review literatur pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah. Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pengawasan. Retrieved July 24, 2021, from http://www.bpkp.go.id/puslitbangwas/konten/2291/14.125-Reviu-Literatur-Pengelolaan-Badan-Usaha-Milik-Daerah. |
| [3] | Muryanto, Y. T., & Djuwityastuti, D. (2014). Model pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) dalam rangka mewujudkan good corporate governance. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 3 (1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V3I1.10136. |
| [4] | Suhendra, A., & Taufiq, M. (2018). Asas fiduciary skill and care dalam pengelolaan BUMD guna mewujudkan good corporate governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 10 (2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.30997/JILL.V10I2.1499. |
| [5] | Siahaan, H., Priyarsono, D., Rifin, A., & Arifin, B. (2021). Factors affecting performance and growth of food sector BUMD Jakarta Province. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 28 (1), 3. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v28i1.1250. |
| [6] | Taufiq, M. (2018). Kedudukan hukum corporate social responsibility pada BUMD berdasar Undang-Undang RI Nomor 40 Tahun 2007. Proceedings Progress Conference, 1 (1), 606–613. |
| [7] | Yansyah, A. B., Muhammad, A. S., & Prastya, I. Y. (2021). Proses pembentukan BUMDesa bersama kandil bahar dengan pendekatan collaborative governance di Kecamatan Tambelan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Perbatasan dan Desa, 1 (1), 128–136. Retrieved from https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/snpd/article/view/3323. |
| [8] | Yani, T. A., & Mansur, T. M. (2020). Mewujudkan keharmonisan undang-undang perseroan terbatas dalam pendirian perseroan daerah. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22 (2), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/KANUN.V22I2.16184. |
| [9] | Irvan, T. (2018). Kajian yuridis pembentukan Badan Usaha Pelabuhan Pemerintah Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 3 (1), 199–212. Retrieved from https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jlpt/article/view/305. |
| [10] | Erwinsyahbana, T. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban yuridis direksi terhadap risiko kerugian keuangan daerah pada Badan Usaha Milik Daerah. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2 (1), 183–212. Retrieved from http://journal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/delegalata/article/view/1145. |
| [11] | Heriasman, H., & Suwaji, S. (2021). Efektifitas dan kontribusi laba Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) terhadap pendapatan asli daerah (PAD) Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. SULTANIST: Jurnal Manajemen dan Keuangan, 9 (1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.37403/SULTANIST.V9I1.245. |
| [12] | Krisharyanto, E., Setyowati, P. J., & Wulandari, S. (2021). Code of Ethics as an Instrument in Improving the Performance of the BUMD Supervisory Board. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3806516. |
| [13] | Budhisulistyawati, A., Muryanto, Y. T., & Sri, A. (2015). Strategi pengelolaan Badan usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) Persero untuk mewujudkan prinsip tata kelola perusahaan yang baik. Private Law, 3 (2), 56–66. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/164361/strategi-pengelolaan-badan-usaha-milik-daerah-bumd-persero-untuk-mewujudkan-prin. |
| [14] | Anderson, J. (1994). Public policymaking. Houghton Mifflin. |
| [15] | Nachmias, D. (1980). The role of evaluation in public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 1163–1169. |
| [16] | Wibawa, S. (1994). Evaluasi kebijakan publik. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. |
| [17] | Stufflebeam, D. L., & Webster, W. J. (1980). An analysis of alternative approach to evaluation. Education Evaluation adn Policy Analysis, 2 (3), 5–20. |
| [18] | Pierson, B. P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45 (04), 595–628. |
| [19] | Poti, J., & Mahadiansar, M. (2020). Evaluasi kebijakan revitalisasi pasar tradisional: Studi pasar akau potong lembu kota tanjungpinang. Kolaborasi: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6 (3), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v6i3.4165. |
| [20] | Lofland, John., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth. |
| [21] | Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodelogi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. |
| [22] | Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literatur reviews: A guide for student of the social and behavior sciences (7th ed.). California: Routledge. |
| [23] | Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. |
| [24] | Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third Edition.). SAGE. |
| [25] | Hurteau, M., Houle, S., & Mongiat, S. (2009). How Legimate and justified are judgement in program evaluation? Evaluation, 15 (3), 307–319. |
| [26] | Gallagher, S. (2019). Banking performance and socio economic development. India: Scientific e-Resources. |
| [27] | Rossi, P. H., W. Lipsey, M., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. New York: SAGE Publications. |
| [28] | House, E. R. (1978). Assumptions Underlying Evaluation Models. Educational Researcher, 7 (3), 4–12. |
| [29] | Grahl, J., & Teague, P. (2004). The German model in danger. Industrial Relations Journal, 35 (6). |
| [30] | Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences after twenty years. Education, 21 (617), 1–15. |
| [31] | Elliott, S. (2012). Public relations defined, after an energetic public discussion. The New York Time. Retrieved February 27, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/business/media/public-relations-a-topic-that-is-tricky-to-define.html. |
| [32] | Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: an introduction. United States America: Allyn and Bacon. |
| [33] | Bourgeois, D. T. (2014). What is an information system? Information Systems for Business and Beyond. Washington DC. |
| [34] | Roznovsky, N. A. (2015). What is management information systems? Mays Business School Texas A & M University. Retrieved February 27, 2020, from http://mays.tamu.edu/info/what-is-mis/. |
| [35] | Cornwell, M. A. (2017). Management information systems (MIS) degree. Saunders College of Business. Retrieved February 27, 2020, from https://saunders.rit.edu/undergraduate/majors-minors/management-information-systems-mis-degree-overview. |
| [36] | Myers, G. (1997). People & Change Planning for Action. Oriel Corporation. |
| [37] | Dykstra, C. A. (1939). The qoest for responsibility. American Political Science Review, 33 (1), 1012–1013. |
| [38] | Williams, C. (2006). Introduction. In Leadership Accountability in a Globalizing World (pp. 1–4). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. |
| [39] | Alqahtani, K. (2016). Decision oriented evaluation: A review of various models of evaluation. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 7 (5), 929–931. |
| [40] | Ascher, W. (1986). The evolution of the policy cciences: Understanding the rise and avoiding the fall. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5 (2), 365. |
| [41] | Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process: Political science and public policy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24 (2), 144–147. |
| [42] | Fitzpatrick, D., Scanlon, E., Krüse, J., Vos, B., Evans-Hurson, R., Fitzpatrick, E., & McSweeney, S. (2012). Blend uniformity analysis of pharmaceutical products by Broadband Acoustic Resonance Dissolution Spectroscopy (BARDS). International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 438 (1–2), 134–139. |
APA Style
Raja Suhaila, Adji Suradji Muhammad, Rudi Subiyakto. (2021). Evaluation of Regional Owned Enterprise Management Policy; Case Study PT. Pelabuhan Kepri, Indonesia. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 5(4), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14
ACS Style
Raja Suhaila; Adji Suradji Muhammad; Rudi Subiyakto. Evaluation of Regional Owned Enterprise Management Policy; Case Study PT. Pelabuhan Kepri, Indonesia. J. Public Policy Adm. 2021, 5(4), 144-150. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14
AMA Style
Raja Suhaila, Adji Suradji Muhammad, Rudi Subiyakto. Evaluation of Regional Owned Enterprise Management Policy; Case Study PT. Pelabuhan Kepri, Indonesia. J Public Policy Adm. 2021;5(4):144-150. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14,
author = {Raja Suhaila and Adji Suradji Muhammad and Rudi Subiyakto},
title = {Evaluation of Regional Owned Enterprise Management Policy; Case Study PT. Pelabuhan Kepri, Indonesia},
journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
volume = {5},
number = {4},
pages = {144-150},
doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20210504.14},
abstract = {Regional-Owned Enterprises, abbreviated as BUMD is government instrument that plays an important role in running and developing regional and national economies. BUMD, the capital, comes from separated regional assets to contribute to the region and carry out regional development through services to the community. PT. Pelabuhan Kepri is a subsidiary BUMD of the Kepulauan Riau (Kepri) Province, which has strategic main tasks and functions in managing the potential or water activities in border areas with neighboring countries to improve the business properly. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluation of the management policies of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri as a form of boosting the Kepri economy. The qualitative research method is carried out using a literature study approach that uses existing secondary data, including reports, journals, e-books, websites, and others considered relevant for depth analysis. The results show that it is necessary to strengthen the regional regulation plan (RAPENDA) regarding optimization in management, which must be discussed with stakeholders as a form of policy evaluation in preparing the management of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri in a sustainable manner for the long term. However, it should be emphasized the implementation of RAPENDA is only to improve the quality and quantity of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri in implementing programs that have great potential in the waters of the Kepri Province in the future, so the local own-source revenue can be by the targets to be achieved.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Regional Owned Enterprise Management Policy; Case Study PT. Pelabuhan Kepri, Indonesia AU - Raja Suhaila AU - Adji Suradji Muhammad AU - Rudi Subiyakto Y1 - 2021/11/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 144 EP - 150 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210504.14 AB - Regional-Owned Enterprises, abbreviated as BUMD is government instrument that plays an important role in running and developing regional and national economies. BUMD, the capital, comes from separated regional assets to contribute to the region and carry out regional development through services to the community. PT. Pelabuhan Kepri is a subsidiary BUMD of the Kepulauan Riau (Kepri) Province, which has strategic main tasks and functions in managing the potential or water activities in border areas with neighboring countries to improve the business properly. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluation of the management policies of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri as a form of boosting the Kepri economy. The qualitative research method is carried out using a literature study approach that uses existing secondary data, including reports, journals, e-books, websites, and others considered relevant for depth analysis. The results show that it is necessary to strengthen the regional regulation plan (RAPENDA) regarding optimization in management, which must be discussed with stakeholders as a form of policy evaluation in preparing the management of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri in a sustainable manner for the long term. However, it should be emphasized the implementation of RAPENDA is only to improve the quality and quantity of PT. Pelabuhan Kepri in implementing programs that have great potential in the waters of the Kepri Province in the future, so the local own-source revenue can be by the targets to be achieved. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -
Email: